Problem Statement
A jet of water 60 mm in diameter with a velocity of 15 m/s strikes a flat plate inclined at an angle of 25° to the axis of the jet. Calculate:
a) The normal force exerted on the plate when it is stationary
b) The normal force exerted on the plate when it is moving at 4.5 m/s in the direction of the jet
c) The work done per sec and the efficiency for case (b)
Given Data
Solution Approach
To solve this problem, we’ll apply the principles of momentum conservation for a jet striking an inclined plate. The key difference from a normal impact is that only the component of velocity perpendicular to the plate causes a normal force on the plate.
We’ll analyze:
- The normal force when the plate is stationary
- The normal force when the plate is moving
- The work done and efficiency when the plate is moving
Calculations
Part A: Normal Force on Stationary Plate
Step 1: For a jet striking an inclined stationary plate, the normal force is given by:
This equation represents the rate of change of momentum in the direction normal to the plate.
Step 2: Substituting the given values:
Normal force on stationary plate (F) = 269 N
Part B: Normal Force on Moving Plate
Step 1: When the plate moves in the direction of the jet, the relative velocity is:
Step 2: The normal force on the moving plate is:
Normal force on moving plate (Fp) = 132 N
Part C: Work Done and Efficiency
Step 1: Work done per second is the product of force and velocity:
Step 2: Kinetic energy of the jet per second:
Step 3: Efficiency is the ratio of work done to kinetic energy:
Work done per second (W) = 594 J/s
Efficiency (η) = 12%
Detailed Explanation
Physics of Inclined Jet Impact
When a water jet strikes an inclined plate, the force exerted has two components: normal to the plate and tangential along the plate. Only the normal component contributes to the force perpendicular to the plate surface. The sine of the angle of inclination (θ) determines what fraction of the jet momentum creates a normal force.
Effect of Plate Motion
When the plate moves in the direction of the jet, the relative velocity between the jet and the plate decreases. This reduces the momentum change rate and consequently the force exerted on the plate. The force is proportional to the square of the relative velocity, which explains the significant reduction from 269 N to 132 N when the plate moves at 4.5 m/s.
Efficiency Analysis
The efficiency of 12% is lower than what would be achieved with a normal impact (perpendicular to the jet). This lower efficiency occurs because:
- Only a component of the jet momentum (Sin θ = Sin 25° = 0.4226) contributes to the normal force
- A significant portion of the kinetic energy is directed tangentially along the plate surface
- Energy is lost in friction and turbulence as the water flows along the inclined surface
Comparison with Perpendicular Impact
For the same jet striking a plate perpendicularly (θ = 90°):
- The normal force would be greater by a factor of 1/Sin 25° (approximately 2.37 times larger)
- The efficiency would be significantly higher
Optimal Conditions
For an inclined plate with angle θ, the theoretical maximum efficiency occurs when the plate velocity (u) is one-third of the jet velocity (V) multiplied by Sin θ. In this case:
Since our plate velocity (4.5 m/s) exceeds this optimal value, we achieve a lower-than-maximum possible efficiency.
Practical Applications
This principle is applied in:
- Design of turbine blades and vanes where the angle of incidence affects power generation efficiency
- Hydraulic machines with inclined surfaces
- Deflectors and diverters in fluid control systems
- Splash plates and shields in industrial processes
Engineering Significance
Understanding the forces exerted by fluid jets on inclined surfaces is crucial in:
- Optimizing energy extraction in hydropower systems
- Designing spray nozzles and irrigation systems
- Analyzing erosion patterns on inclined surfaces
- Calculating loads on structures subjected to fluid jets at various angles
This problem demonstrates the importance of considering both the angle of impact and the relative motion when analyzing fluid-structure interactions in engineering applications.





